NZGS members and committee provide a significant amount of support to projects run by other organisations to help further the interests of the society and our members. The most significant of these are summarised here.
MBIE BSP Seismic Risk Work Programme
NZGS representative: Rick Wentz
Engineering NZ is managing this project for MBIE to implement the changes coming from the updated National Seismic Hazard Model into codes and practice. This comprises:
- Project 1: To incorporate new hazard including geotechnical considerations into 1170.5 (excluding basin effects) focused on elastic design spectrum. Due late 2022.
- Project 2: To overhaul VM4 (and possible creation of new verification method for slopes), reconsider limit states, and incorporate uncertainty from the National Seismic Hazard Model.
MBIE/NZGS Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Modules Finalisation Project
NZGS management committee lead: Ross Roberts and Tony Fairclough
Core team: Mike Stannard, Rick Wentz, Nick Traylen, Kevin McManus, Misko Cubrinovski, Cameron Keepa, Alexi Murachev, Ananth Balachandra
Programme: Module publication is expected in August 2021
The Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering modules were published in 2017 as Revision 0, with the intent that they be tested in practice and feedback collated for future improvements. NZGS has been working in partnership with Engineering NZ (as project manager) and MBIE (as lead funding agency) to incorporate this feedback into the documents.
NZS 4431 update
NZGS management committee lead: Ross Roberts and Sally Hargraves
Core team: William Gray, Tony Fairclough, Guy Forrest, Andrew Rose, Mark Stringer, Tony Kao, Simon Barber, Ali Shokri, Timothy Farrant, Chris Massey, Barbara Rouse
Programme: Phase 1 – initiation (December 2020). Phase 2 – standard development (July 2021). Phase 3 – Public consultation (November 2021). Phase 4 – Approvals (December 2021). Phase 5 – Standard publication (January 2022)
This project is for a complete revision and update of the existing New Zealand Standard NZS 4431:1989.
NZS 4431:1989 Code of practice for earth fill for residential development describes practices to be adopted in the planning, execution, inspection and control of earth fills for residential sub-divisional developments in order to minimise damage being sustained by buildings and services through subsequent ground movements. NZS 4431 is referenced in the New Zealand Building Code compliance documents Acceptable Solutions E2/AS2 and Verification Methods B1/VM1. It is intended that this revised and updated standard will continue to be used in these compliance documents.
June 2021 update: progress developing the updated text is going well.
NZS 3604 update
NZGS management committee lead: Phil Robins
Core team: Sally Hargraves
Programme: TBC
NZGS have an interest in the latest update, specifically in the work item “Foundations on Expansive Soils and also Liquefaction-prone Soils“. Sally Hargraves has been accepted on the review panel as the NZGS representative. A meeting has been held with a number of technical experts and interested parties after which the following has been agreed:
Expansive Soils: There is insufficient information currently for standard foundation solutions to be added to NZS 3604. NZGS have volunteered to coordinate the development of a Practice Note (or similar guidance document) that sets out investigation techniques, laboratory testing and classification in the NZ setting, heavily utilising the existing AS 2890 where applicable. It will also aim to include foundation design options for various classes of expansivity. Over time some of this may be able to be included in a future update of NZS 3604. The panel of experts gathered for the meeting have agreed to take part in the development of this Practice Note.
Liquefiable Soils: It has been agreed that sites where liquefiable conditions are present are usually sufficiently complex to warrant consideration by a geotechnical professional. As such, standard ‘acceptable’ foundation solutions will not be added to NZS 3604. As there is already sufficient guidance regarding investigations, analysis and foundation design in general use (refer MBIE/NZGS Modules; also MfE Planning for Liquefaction document), additional guidance in this space is not required. It is proposed that the foundation options presented in the Canterbury Guidance (for repairing and rebuilding houses post-earthquake) can be copied into a separate document as an Appendix to Module 4: Foundations. Additional foundation options can be added for the most common scenarios that crop up around the rest of NZ such as additional options in the TC2/TC3 hybrid category and new options in a TC1/TC2 hybrid category. The use of the term “Technical Category – TC” will be phased out in the new document as these are only applicable in the areas tested by earthquake shaking in the Canterbury region.
Engineering NZ occupational regulation review
NZGS management committee lead: Tony Fairclough and Ross Roberts
Core team: Ross Roberts
Programme: ongoing
NZGS has provided formal feedback to MBIE (see here for more details). We worked closely with Engineering New Zealand and our sister societies (particularly NZSEE, SESOC, SFPE) to provide robust and consistent feedback. MBIE is now considering this feedback, and we will continue to lobby for the best outcome for our members and New Zealand.
Engineering NZ review of the New Zealand Geotechnical Database
NZGS management committee lead: Ross Roberts
Core team: Engineering NZ staff
Programme:
Engineering NZ has been asked by MBIE and EQC to develop a project to review the NZ Geotechnical Database and identify future improvements and funding options. NZGS is very keen to ensure this work is done well, and is engaged with ENZ in the scoping of this project.